Tag Archives: Zionism

GMOs in Iran

Genetically modified organisms seem to have reached Iran as well. The Jewish invention that can take down the whole world, and probably will, if nobody does something. Genetically modified organisms (GMO) are a crime against nature and should be avoided at all cost. Basically, GMO means changing the genetics of animals, food, cotton and many more. You would think it’s safe, but in reality it’s really dangerous. GM food has killed so many people in so many countries, it gives you cancer, changes your genetics and never actually leaves your stomach. That’s the truth, many studies have shown that GM food can’t actually be digested, your stomach acid isn’t strong enough to break the food down. So there is a big chance that you could have a big piece of genetically modified corn in your stomach right now. But studies have also shown that people who change to 100% organic food can actually restore their health back to normal and get rid of the GM leftovers in their stomach. That’s why it’s important for Iranians to only eat organic food, especially for those who live abroad, as food grown in Iran usually has better quality since people here don’t add that much crap to their food as compared to the United States for example.

It is with great anger that we have to announce that genetically modified cotton has officially been approved to be grown in Iran, even though cows in India for example have died from eating it. The article can be read here on PressTV:


Good food is very important for us! You can’t raise a healthy and strong middle class without good food. Therefore we have made this a top priority, and added a new point to our Party Program:

“Genetically modified organisms are strictly prohibited. They are considered a crime against nature and therefore anybody involved with GMOs will be executed.”

Eat well, work out and fight for National Socialism! Javid Iran!

We would like to announce that we won’t let anyone join our party that consumes GM food or has anything else to do with GMOs. The same goes for stem cell research and cloning. It’s absolutely forbidden!

Iran—Iraq War


Iranian soldiers during Iran—Iraq War

The Iran—Iraq War was one of the stupidest mistakes ever made…

The Iran—Iraq War was an armed conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Iraq lasting from September 1980 to August 1988, making it the 20th century’s longest conventional war. The war began when Iraq invaded Iran via air and land on 22 September 1980. The Iranian Revolution in 1979 would inspire insurgency among Iraq’s backstabbing Shias. Although Iraq hoped to take advantage of Iran’s revolutionary chaos and attacked without formal warning, they made only limited progress into Iran and were quickly repelled. For the next seven years, Iran was on the offensive.

The war was provoked by the US and Israel. The Mossad had been trying to assassinate Saddam Hussein since the early 70s because Saddam was getting increasingly powerful during the years. He strengthened the military of Iraq and by the year 1991, Iraq had the 4th largest military in the world. Thanks to Saddam, Iraq became wealthy, powerful and extremely stable. The sectarian violence ended and Wahhabi movements and Shia movements where effectively taken care of. A stable Iraq was a threat to Israel and its allies (USA, UK, surrounding Arab countries… ).

When, in 1979, Iran was in a revolutionary chaos (there were major clashes between Communist, Nationalist and Islamist forces), the US provoked the war from Iraq’s side so that both sides would destroy each other during the process. The USA promised Iraq better relations, no sanctions, major economic aid and they even helped Iraq build nuclear weapons but they also gave Iraq some chemical weapons (Mustard and nerve agents) but as soon as Iraq lost the war — Saddam was stabbed in the back by his “friends”.

The US didn’t only provide Iraq with weapons but also Iran was provided with weapons — afterwards the sale of arms to Iran was named the Iran—Contra affair. The reason for the sale of arms to Iran — even though it was illegal to do so — was to make Iran and Iraq destroy each other without any bigger involvement from US or Israeli side.

During the Battle of Waterloo, the Rothschild’s (a Jewish family of bankers) funded both sides to first of all destroy as much as possible and also to profit heavily from both sides. Now just take a second and think about that, it didn’t matter who would win, because either way they would profit and gain in power. Strategically it’s genius, but morally, well what would you say…

Also, don’t forget that after about a year, Saddam Hussein tried to end the war. He negotiated peace talks with Khomeini, though he didn’t care since he saw the war as a holy one. The US and Israel also forced Iraq to continue and therefore the war continued.

The war cost both sides in lives and economic damage: half a million Iraqi and Iranian soldiers, with an equivalent number of civilians, are believed to have died, with many more injured; however, the war brought neither reparations nor changes in borders.

Javid Iran!

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

The perhaps most important document ever for us Iranians to read is “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”! The document explains why the Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had to die and why the same thing will happen to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. It also explains why other regimes (Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Morroco, Kuwait… ) in the Middle East stayed even though those regimes murdered a 100 times more people than Iraq and Syria together.

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm is a policy document that was prepared Iraq/Syriain 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel. The report explained a new approach to solving Israel’s security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on “Western values”. It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, and the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting their possession of “weapons of mass destruction”.

As the United States and others prepared to attack Syria for Israel with a made-up excuse, remember this was all planned out well in advance. Additionally, the USA and Britain used chemical weapons on innocent civilians during the Iraq War.

According to the report’s preamble, it was written by the Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000, which was a part of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies.

Former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle was the “Study Group Leader”, but the final report included ideas from Douglas Feith, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.

“While there are those who will counsel continuity, Israel has the opportunity to make a clean break; it can forge a peace process and strategy based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism, the starting point of which must be economic reform.”

The introduction specifically proposes three new policies:

1. Rather than pursuing a “comprehensive peace” with the entire Arab world, Israel should work jointly with Jordan and Turkey to “contain, destabilize, and roll-back” those entities that are threats to all three.

2. Changing the nature of relations with the Palestinians, specifically reserving the right of “hot pursuit” anywhere within Palestinian territory as well as attempting to promote alternatives to Arafat’s leadership.

3. Changing relations with the United States stressing self-reliance and strategic cooperation.

“This can only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which prevents economic reform.”

“A New Approach to Peace”

“While the previous government, and many abroad, may emphasize land for peace— which placed Israel in the position of cultural, economic, political, diplomatic, and military retreat — the new government can promote “Western values and traditions”. Such an approach, which will be well received in the United States, includes peace for peace, peace through strength and self reliance: the balance of power.”

“Securing the Northern Border”

“Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: —striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan. —paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces… “

“Israel also can take this opportunity to remind the world of the nature of the Syrian regime. Syria repeatedly breaks its word. It violated numerous agreements with the Turks, and has betrayed the United States by continuing to occupy Lebanon in violation of the Taef agreement in 1989. Instead, Syria staged a sham election, installed a quisling regime, and forced Lebanon to sign a “Brotherhood Agreement” in 1991, that terminated Lebanese sovereignty. And Syria has begun colonizing Lebanon with hundreds of thousands of Syrians, while killing tens of thousands of its own citizens at a time, as it did in only three days in 1983 in Hama… Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan comprehensive peace and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction programs, and rejecting land for peace deals on the Golan Heights.”

“Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy”

“Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”

“Since Iraq’s future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq, including such measures as: visiting Jordan as the first official state visit, even before a visit to the United States, of the new Netanyahu government; supporting King Hussein by providing him with some tangible security measures to protect his regime against Syrian subversion; encouraging — through influence in the U.S. business community — investment in Jordan to structurally shift Jordan’s economy away from dependence on Iraq; and diverting Syria’s attention by using Lebanese opposition elements to destabilize Syrian control of Lebanon… Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and Syria. Shia retain strong ties to the Hashemites: the Shia venerate foremost the Prophet’s family, the direct descendants of which — and in whose veins the blood of the Prophet flows — is King Hussein.”

“Changing the Nature of Relations with the Palestinians”

“Israel has a chance to forge a new relationship between itself and the Palestinians. First and foremost, Israel’s efforts to secure its streets may require hot pursuit into Palestinian-controlled areas, a justifiable practice with which Americans can sympathize.”

“To emphasize the point that Israel regards the actions of the PLO problematic, but not the Arab people, Israel might want to consider making a special effort to reward friends and advancehuman rights among Arabs.”

“Forging A New U.S.-Israeli Relationship”

“Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality — not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes. Israel’s new strategy — based on a shared philosophy of peace through strength — reflects continuity with “Western values” by stressing that Israel is self-reliant, does not need U.S. troops in any capacity to defend it, including on the Golan Heights, and can manage its own affairs.”

“To reinforce this point, the Prime Minister can use his forthcoming visit to announce that Israel is now mature enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and loan guarantees at least, which prevent economic reform.”

“Conclusions – Transcending the Arab-Israeli Conflict”

“Israel’s new agenda can signal a clean break by abandoning a policy which assumed exhaustion and allowed strategic retreat by reestablishing the principle of preemption, rather than retaliation alone and by ceasing to absorb blows to the nation without response.”

“Israel’s new strategic agenda can shape the regional environment in ways that grant Israel the room to refocus its energies back to where they are most needed: to rejuvenate its national idea, which can only come through replacing Israel’s socialist foundations with a more sound footing; and to overcome its exhaustion, which threatens the survival of the nation.”

“Ultimately, Israel can do more than simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict though war. No amount of weapons or victories will grant Israel the peace its seeks. When Israel is on a sound economic footing, and is free, powerful, and healthy internally, it will no longer simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict; it will transcend it. As a senior Iraqi opposition leader said recently: Israel must rejuvenate and revitalize its moral and intellectual leadership. It is an important — if not the most important element in the history of the Middle East. Israel — proud, wealthy, solid, and strong — would be the basis of a truly new and peaceful Middle East.”

“Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime minister in 1996, to make ‘a clean break’ from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries. Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Washington. In Paul Wolfowitz’s words, ‘The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad.’ It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, and Jewish interests are not the main reason for it now.”

“Recently, Netanyahu suggested that President Bush had assured him Iran will be prevented from going nuclear. I take him at his word. Netanyahu seems to be the main mover in America’s official adoption of the 1996 white paper A Clean Break, authored by him and American fellow neocons, which aimed to aggressively remake the strategic environments of Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. As they say in boxing circles, three down, two to go.”

Journalist Jason Vest wrote that the report was “a kind of US-Israeli neoconservative manifesto.” He also wrote:

“To properly understand the Syria Accountability Act, one has to go back to a 1996 document, ‘A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,’ drafted by a team of advisers to Benjamin Netanyahu in his run for prime minister of Israel. The authors included current Bush advisers Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. ‘Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil,’ they wrote, calling for ‘striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.’ No wonder Perle was delighted by the Israeli strike. ‘It will help the peace process,’ he told the Washington Post, adding later that the United States itself might have to attack Syria. But what Perle means by ‘helping the peace process’ is not resolving the conflict by bringing about a viable, sovereign Palestinian state but rather – as underscored in ‘A Clean Break’ – ‘transcending the Arab-Israeli conflict’ altogether by forcing the Arabs to accept most, if not all, of Israel’s territorial conquests and its nuclear hegemony in the region.”

The document has been in use for the last 18 years and it did secure Israel thereby destroying almost all of the Middle East and North Africa… That’s what the Jews do best, killing people and destroying nations!

Do you want to stop them? Join our party before it’s Iran’s turn…

Problems fixed

Good day everybody!

We have had a few problems the past few weeks, so it wasn’t possible for us to post anything new. Fortunately these problems are now fixed and a new article is going to come out today. The article is going to be about Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and it’s going to explain how he laid the ground for Khomeini to take power in Iran.

Khomeini and Shah of Iran

So be sure to check back! Javid Iran!

Hezb-e Sosialist-e Melli-ye Iran/National Socialist Party of Iran

For years now Iranians have been living outside their nation, for years we have been rootless and didn’t know what to do against it. We try to fill our emptiness with material things, but does that change anything? No, it does not. Some Iranians travel the whole wide world because they think that will help and make them feel less empty, but again it does not. I am here to tell you that none of this will fill that emptiness. All of that is artificial, not natural.

But to tell you about something else, we’re not alone. Look at the immigration that is going on in the world, is that natural? No, it’s not! Millions of people have to leave their homes every year because of war, that is completely insane!

Why wage war against so many nations? What do these criminals that start these wars get out of it? And also who starts these wars?

Most Iranians would now say it’s the UK and the US or maybe the Islamists. Mostly because they also think the Iranian Revolution (the revolution in 1979) was done by the US and Britain. So that Khomeini could take power. This has been put in our brains for years, mostly by our parents. But also by others (propaganda by the media like BBC Persian, ITN and so on…).

To clarify this just for now (I’m going to write a bit more a little later so you really understand what happened) the Iranian Revolution was not done by the US nor the UK, it was simply a revolution. Under the late Shah the people suffered (he was supported by both these terror nations by the way), he was oppressive and Iran was in a collapse. Iran was before run by his father Reza Shah Bozorg (R.I.P.), he took power in 1925 and before the Iranian people even knew his name he had already introduced numerous economic, social and political reforms. Before he took power, Iran was one of the poorest nations in the Middle East with almost no military force, that changed under him. He transformed Iran into a much richer state (he wasn’t perfect but when you compare him to the other rulers before him, he definitely change a lot), he formed the powerful military of Iran (Imperial Iranian Army, Navy, Air Force) and he did much more. He was also the one that introduced Ethnic nationalism to us, he gave Iranians the cultural identity we have today. That means without him, we wouldn’t even know what the Farvahar is. And he also gave us that proud feeling we have now today when we see an Iranian, or when we talk Persian or when we see the flag of our beloved nation wave.

In 1941, the Soviet Union and the UK attacked Iran without any warning and with no mercy, they slaughtered our people and tortured them in an unthinkable way. Little Iran was no match to these powerful and evil terror states so they crushed Iran and kicked out its father to Johannesburg. Why? Because he defended his nation. It was now that his son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi came to power, the Soviets and the UK put him to power and everything he did was under their influence, the US later also became an “ally” to Iran. More like a cancer than an ally.

I’m not going to write much more about Mohammad Reza Shah, I can take that another time if you would like that. But as I told you, he did everything for his bosses (UK, US), he was nothing more than a puppet. Don’t get fooled by the celebrations in 1971, it wasn’t for the people, it was for the royals.

But to get back to our questions…

Why wage war against so many nations?

There have been so many wars in the world that most ordinary Iranians don’t care anymore. That is EXACTLY what our enemy wants! But to finally tell you about our enemy, it’s the Jew. The International Jew! And it has ALWAYS been him! The Jew has started hundreds of wars (including WWI, WWII) to destroy our world. Every war makes the Jews richer and makes the affected nations more unstable. An unstable nation is easier to conquer than a strong and stable one.

To prove that just look at Syria now, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Iran

Almost 2 million people in Tripoli protested against the NATO bombing of Libya (1/3 of the population), still the West didn’t care they just destroyed their nation and killed their leader. But why? Because Libya under Gaddafi was independent, not like today. Libya’s central bank was state-owned, not a private bank like today. It gave out interest-free loans to the people, something Jews don’t like. How to profit when there is no interest…

The same thing is happening to Syria right now, they don’t control Syria’s central bank so Bashar al-Assad has to go, even though he has been elected for president by the Syrian people!

And that happened to Iraq and Egypt as well! Even Afghanistan got affected, they had Taliban rule sure, but you seem to forget that the central bank of Afghanistan still was under Afghan control. I don’t support the Taliban in any way, I only wanted to make a statement about their banking system!

And now it’s our turn people! Afghanistan got invaded in 2001, not because they hated the Taliban. No, they created the Taliban! It was because they needed to take over their banking system and also to have more military bases for the next war!

Which war? The Jewish-Iranian war! Remember the divide and conquer technique, it is very effective. If you have been in Iran at least once, you have probably noticed the huge amount of needles on the ground. Since 2001, there has been a huge increase, but why?


There you have it!

Iranians around the world want to fight the Islamic Republic of Iran, but NEVER forget that the Islamic Republic of Iran is protecting Iran! In Iran there are interest-free loans, oil money gets into our pockets not the Jews pockets and much more…

Millions of Iranians every year protest for a new democratic government all around the world. They don’t know that THIS is exactly what the Jews want. We’re the only nation standing up against the Jewish-Zionist-Bolshevik-Cancer. Syria is dying and North Korea is a disaster, so we really are the last one!

This Is Democracy:

hämta images  Aqm2hO-CEAELtVH  a3332813024_10    7604_4d27_500hämta (1)

What do these criminals that start these wars get out of it?

As I mentioned above they profit from war, but they also get control of that nation. They turn that nation into a puppet one, by controlling its economy through the banking system (turning state-owned banks into private ones) and then they steal money through the bank. When they control the currency, they also control the oil of the nation because oil and money are linked to each other. It’s a very old strategy called divide and conquer, you make the people hate each other and when it’s time you invade that nation and you’re in control.

And also who starts these wars?

The Jews! The Jews own almost all banks, all the media, governments and so on…

I’m going to give you some proof too:

If you really want this, then go ahead and join the terrorists! But if you want freedom for the Iranian people, independence and a strong state and nation that only cares about the people and not about any money or oil or power then join me and others in the battle for a free, independent and strong Iran!

We can only stop the Islamic Republic of Iran through National Socialism!

Every other ideology like Communism, Liberalism, Capitalism, Socialism, Islamism, Democracy… WILL FAIL!

It’s up to YOU! — Iran or the Jews?


National Socialism