Tag Archives: Middle East

We’re Back!

Welcome back everybody!

We would like to apologize for the long time we were gone! We had internal problems and other things that came in between, which stopped us from posting articles.

We also would like to apologize to the hard working men and women who applied for a membership but never got anything back. We will work hard to add you as members as fast as we possibly can.

We also would like to announce that at the end of this month (June 2016), all articles that never got to be put on the website will be uploaded.

We will work harder than ever before! Persians never stop fighting!

Just look at the world today, the resistance movements are bigger than ever! Finally, we are getting closer and closer to freedom. Finally, the Jews are losing power. IT’S STOP WE WAKE UP AND FREE IRAN ONCE AND FOR ALL!

JAVID IRAN!

Israel’s Hate On Iran

Ever since the Nuclear Deal went trough, Israel has been on Iran’s back 24 hours a day. They say that we have nuclear weapons, that we’re the greatest terror nation in the world, and so on. What is funny is that the Iranian regime now lets the UN enter Iran, for them to check all of our nuclear reactors and other places to see that the regime doesn’t produce any nuclear weapons. Even the USA and the European Union trust the UN’s judgement, the only “state” that doesn’t do so is Israel. They still say the regime is producing nuclear arms.

We, as national socialists know that this is pure bullshit. The Iranian regime never did produce any nuclear weapons, nor did they even think about it. The same thing happened with Iraq, Libya, Syria and so many more nations… Israel simply wants Iran to become its bitch (I’m sorry for my choice of words). Though, that will never happen! We’ll never stop fighting, we have existed for 10 000 years and we will exist for at least 10 000 more years. Javid Iran!

Also, we need to remember that what the Iranian regime is doing, is extremely stupid. They are letting agents from the UN enter Iran… who knows who these people are? They could be CIA, MI6 or Mossad agents, there to spy on our great nation. This is the first step for a war on Iran! This is what happens when a bunch of people with an IQ of 80, get to run our nation. They don’t think, they just act.

Israel doesn’t want the sanctions to be lifted, they want us to starve and die. That’s why they are “begging” the USA and the EU to put sanctions on us, once again. They use nuclear weapons as an excuse for that. That’s why we can’t trust the EU, USA, UN or any other organization, union, country and more in the world. Why? They are ALL controlled by Jews.

The Jews are the most hated people in Europe, especially in Greece, they are extremely hated in the Middle East and other parts of the world. People are getting more and more pissed off for every day that passes, unemployment is rising, people are losing their savings, their homes, their f***ing lives. Immigration is rising, racial riots are happening more often, people are finally waking up. The most sold book in Greece and Iran is… Mein Kampf. It is time that YOU finally join the National Socialist Party of Iran! We have gotten an increase in members, Iranians are waking up. It is time that YOU also wake up, because we don’t take easy on traitors – we punish them severely!

So, what are you – a traitor or a nationalist?

The Kurdish Problem

Yes, it’s time we talk about a big problem almost as big as the Jewish Problem, it’s the Kurdish Problem! Most Iranians have noticed how big of a problem the Kurds are to us and our dear neighbours, they work together with the Jews to steal land from Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Armenia and from us Iran. Most people have also noticed how much these parasites love Israel and the USA. Are we really just going to sit by and let them take everything for their so-called “Kurdistan” or are we going to do something? We, at the National Socialist Party of Iran, have come up with a solution that will fit us all, maybe even the Kurds.

The Problem Area:

Problem

Map showing Iran, Iraq, Syria, Armenia and Turkey

Problems

Map showing “Kurdistan”

As you can see a big part of these five nations are affected, including ours. Few leaders have dared to step their foot down and really fight the Kurds effectively, Hafez al-Assad and his son Bashar al-Assad (Leader of the Syrian nation) and Saddam Hussein (him also being the most effective one) are the only ones.

Many probably think I forgot to mention Atatürk or other Turkish leaders, no I didn’t. Atajew (please read this) created this Kurdish problem, while he was ruling the new Republic of Turkey, he created the identity of the “Turk” and everyone living in Turkey had to accept this new identity. Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians all of them were now “Turks” and anyone not accepting this new identity was killed. The Greek Genocide and the Armenian Genocide happened because of this reason, they didn’t accept the identity of the “Turk”. Apart from Armenians, Greeks and some Assyrians, there were other people living in the east of Turkey — those people came to be known as Kurds — before that people just thought they were Armenian or Assyrian.

They are a mix of Arab, Iranian and Turkish blood whose history and culture is a mix of all these three cultures and history. They lived mostly in Turkey until Atatürk committed a genocide on them because they were rebelling against his regime for it being anti-Islamic. From then on they fled into the other nations. Atatürk crushed the rebellion and called these people Kurds (it isn’t sure whether it was Atatürk or other Jews working with him who came up with the name) but one thing is for sure, from then on they started fighting for this fake identity and demanded their own country. Nobody accepted that because they don’t have the right to an own nation, they are mixed-race people with no history or culture. Just like gypsies and Jews. Therefore these people aligned themselves with the Jewish-controlled Soviet Union, the USA and Israel to get what they want. Now we can see the consequences of that in the Middle East. That Turkish planes bombed Kurdish targets in Syria (Ayn al-Arab) doesn’t mean anything, the regime in Turkey plays with its people. This is only to make Erdojew (Yes Erdogan is Jewish, he is also a Dönmeh Jew just like Atatürk. Shows that Dönmeh Jews still exist in Turkey) look good so he gets reelected. Both the Turkish regime and the Kurdish terrorists are well aware of what is going on.

The Armenians haven’t done much, mostly because they aren’t affected the same way we are. Our regime hasn’t done much either, except a few occasional battles between the regime and the Kurdish communist/separatist parties trying to create an Iranian “Kurdistan”. But no real deportation has happened ever in our history.

That’s enough information, now let’s talk about the solution we have come up with:

1. Cooperation

For this plan to work we have to work together. That means Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Armenia and Iran have to put their differences behind and work together to make this plan work. Unfortunately as most of you already knew, the possibility of this happening is almost zero because of Syria being at war, Iraq being under Jewish control/civil war, Turkey being the biggest terror state in the Middle East and Armenia having other problems. So one other way would be that every nation does its own part. We take care of the Kurds in Iran, Syria of its own Kurds and so on. It all depends on how the situation looks like in the Middle East when we take over in Iran.

2. Propaganda

For this plan to work we have to spread propaganda! Show the Iranians how many people die every day because of them, how much they love Israel and so on. Use pictures, use your mouth to talk to people on the street, use the internet, I don’t care how you do it, just do it. The more people know — the better!

Some pictures to use:

Terrorism

Which one can you trust…? It’s time we take down the Jews and their puppets!

Crap

“We love you Israel, we will kill everyone you want us to kill!”

3. Relocation

Once we have finished step one and step two, it’s time we move on to the more dangerous third part — the relocation of the Kurds. It’s very important the other parts were done the right way so we don’t get too much resistance. We want to relocate the Kurds, not kill them — so we have to plan very carefully to avoid the Jews and their puppets from interfering into our business. So this plan can go two ways — either we, Syria, Turkey, Iraq and Armenia cooperate and take a piece of Turkey’s land (the reason we took Turkey is because it’s their fault we have this problem to begin with) and give it to the Kurds (just big enough to house all 35 million of the world’s Kurds) demanding that they stay in that piece of land and help us fight the Jews or everybody does their own part meaning we deport our Kurds to neighbouring Iraq as it is easier than sending them directly to Turkey (Turkey most probably won’t accept them, they hate them more than we do) and then let Iraq do their own part sending all their Kurds but also the ones we deported to Iraq, to Turkey — then Syria and Armenia will have to do the same and when they’re all in Turkey, the Turks deport their Kurds to that piece of land they want to give them. After that the Kurds stay in that piece of land and must help us fight the Jews. The second option uses the same method as in the first option, only difference being that there is the possibility that the other nations say no, and don’t get rid of their Kurds — but no matter what we will get rid of our Kurds.

4. Peace

If it all worked out, then we will have peace and can finally breathe out. We solved the Kurdish Problem!

Be proud, be Persian! Javid Iran!

The World Is Changing

The past few weeks have been interesting, support for the Greek National Socialist party Golden Dawn has increased, Egypt’s government (led by Abdul Fatah al-Sisi) has been telling the truth in the media about how ISIS is an US-Israeli project to destabilize the Middle East (even though its number one priority is to take down Syria) and also how the FSA and the so-called Arab Spring is just an excuse to take down Israel’s enemies one after one (Libya, Syria and so on…).

Jewish banksters were caught manipulating the foreign exchange market and were fined billions of dollars, banks responsible are UBS, Citigroup, JPMorgan, Royal Bank of Scotland and HSBC. This isn’t news really, since these things happen all the time, they are happening right now as we speak.

The Syrian Social Nationalist Party (the biggest NS party in the Middle East) is growing stronger and stronger every day and with over 150 000 members (and hundreds of thousands of sympathisers) that are all armed and ready to fight for Syria and other Arab nations, the FSA, ISIS and other terrorist organizations are having a tough time taking down Bashar al-Assad.

The National Socialist revolution will most probably start in Europe as the situation looks right now, before spreading to other parts of the world. Iranians in Europe and other parts of the world should move to Iran, if they have the possibility. That is very important since we want to take power in Iran, not in Europe or any other part of the world. We recommend every Iranian to prepare, dark and dangerous times lie ahead of us. The best way to prepare for war and to actually prevent it from happening is to join this party. By joining the National Socialist Party of Iran, you are helping Iran turn glorious and strong again!

Dark and dangerous times lie ahead!

Dark and dangerous times lie ahead!

Javid Iran!

Iran—Iraq War

War

Iranian soldiers during Iran—Iraq War

The Iran—Iraq War was one of the stupidest mistakes ever made…

The Iran—Iraq War was an armed conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Iraq lasting from September 1980 to August 1988, making it the 20th century’s longest conventional war. The war began when Iraq invaded Iran via air and land on 22 September 1980. The Iranian Revolution in 1979 would inspire insurgency among Iraq’s backstabbing Shias. Although Iraq hoped to take advantage of Iran’s revolutionary chaos and attacked without formal warning, they made only limited progress into Iran and were quickly repelled. For the next seven years, Iran was on the offensive.

The war was provoked by the US and Israel. The Mossad had been trying to assassinate Saddam Hussein since the early 70s because Saddam was getting increasingly powerful during the years. He strengthened the military of Iraq and by the year 1991, Iraq had the 4th largest military in the world. Thanks to Saddam, Iraq became wealthy, powerful and extremely stable. The sectarian violence ended and Wahhabi movements and Shia movements where effectively taken care of. A stable Iraq was a threat to Israel and its allies (USA, UK, surrounding Arab countries… ).

When, in 1979, Iran was in a revolutionary chaos (there were major clashes between Communist, Nationalist and Islamist forces), the US provoked the war from Iraq’s side so that both sides would destroy each other during the process. The USA promised Iraq better relations, no sanctions, major economic aid and they even helped Iraq build nuclear weapons but they also gave Iraq some chemical weapons (Mustard and nerve agents) but as soon as Iraq lost the war — Saddam was stabbed in the back by his “friends”.

The US didn’t only provide Iraq with weapons but also Iran was provided with weapons — afterwards the sale of arms to Iran was named the Iran—Contra affair. The reason for the sale of arms to Iran — even though it was illegal to do so — was to make Iran and Iraq destroy each other without any bigger involvement from US or Israeli side.

During the Battle of Waterloo, the Rothschild’s (a Jewish family of bankers) funded both sides to first of all destroy as much as possible and also to profit heavily from both sides. Now just take a second and think about that, it didn’t matter who would win, because either way they would profit and gain in power. Strategically it’s genius, but morally, well what would you say…

Also, don’t forget that after about a year, Saddam Hussein tried to end the war. He negotiated peace talks with Khomeini, though he didn’t care since he saw the war as a holy one. The US and Israel also forced Iraq to continue and therefore the war continued.

The war cost both sides in lives and economic damage: half a million Iraqi and Iranian soldiers, with an equivalent number of civilians, are believed to have died, with many more injured; however, the war brought neither reparations nor changes in borders.

Javid Iran!

We’re advancing

Hello to all of our supporters!

It looks like we are past 200 hits since we started in July, though we wish we had done more to get more views. We’ve only written a few posts and only made one small video on our YouTube page. We’ll be posting two new articles this week about the Iran—Iraq War and about the extremely dangerous Mossad trained Wahhabist group of ISIS which is becoming dangerous even to our nation.

We would like to thank everyone who visited our website and took the time to read our articles; you are heroes!

We’re still a small party though and we need more members to advance further, so please for the sake of our people and our country and even all of the Middle East; join the National Socialist Party of Iran.

Javid Iran!

A Tribute to our Flag and Nation:

Flag

Persepolis

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

The perhaps most important document ever for us Iranians to read is “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”! The document explains why the Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had to die and why the same thing will happen to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. It also explains why other regimes (Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Morroco, Kuwait… ) in the Middle East stayed even though those regimes murdered a 100 times more people than Iraq and Syria together.

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm is a policy document that was prepared Iraq/Syriain 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel. The report explained a new approach to solving Israel’s security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on “Western values”. It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, and the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting their possession of “weapons of mass destruction”.

As the United States and others prepared to attack Syria for Israel with a made-up excuse, remember this was all planned out well in advance. Additionally, the USA and Britain used chemical weapons on innocent civilians during the Iraq War.

According to the report’s preamble, it was written by the Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000, which was a part of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies.

Former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle was the “Study Group Leader”, but the final report included ideas from Douglas Feith, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.

“While there are those who will counsel continuity, Israel has the opportunity to make a clean break; it can forge a peace process and strategy based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism, the starting point of which must be economic reform.”

The introduction specifically proposes three new policies:

1. Rather than pursuing a “comprehensive peace” with the entire Arab world, Israel should work jointly with Jordan and Turkey to “contain, destabilize, and roll-back” those entities that are threats to all three.

2. Changing the nature of relations with the Palestinians, specifically reserving the right of “hot pursuit” anywhere within Palestinian territory as well as attempting to promote alternatives to Arafat’s leadership.

3. Changing relations with the United States stressing self-reliance and strategic cooperation.

“This can only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which prevents economic reform.”

“A New Approach to Peace”

“While the previous government, and many abroad, may emphasize land for peace— which placed Israel in the position of cultural, economic, political, diplomatic, and military retreat — the new government can promote “Western values and traditions”. Such an approach, which will be well received in the United States, includes peace for peace, peace through strength and self reliance: the balance of power.”

“Securing the Northern Border”

“Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: —striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan. —paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces… “

“Israel also can take this opportunity to remind the world of the nature of the Syrian regime. Syria repeatedly breaks its word. It violated numerous agreements with the Turks, and has betrayed the United States by continuing to occupy Lebanon in violation of the Taef agreement in 1989. Instead, Syria staged a sham election, installed a quisling regime, and forced Lebanon to sign a “Brotherhood Agreement” in 1991, that terminated Lebanese sovereignty. And Syria has begun colonizing Lebanon with hundreds of thousands of Syrians, while killing tens of thousands of its own citizens at a time, as it did in only three days in 1983 in Hama… Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan comprehensive peace and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction programs, and rejecting land for peace deals on the Golan Heights.”

“Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy”

“Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”

“Since Iraq’s future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq, including such measures as: visiting Jordan as the first official state visit, even before a visit to the United States, of the new Netanyahu government; supporting King Hussein by providing him with some tangible security measures to protect his regime against Syrian subversion; encouraging — through influence in the U.S. business community — investment in Jordan to structurally shift Jordan’s economy away from dependence on Iraq; and diverting Syria’s attention by using Lebanese opposition elements to destabilize Syrian control of Lebanon… Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and Syria. Shia retain strong ties to the Hashemites: the Shia venerate foremost the Prophet’s family, the direct descendants of which — and in whose veins the blood of the Prophet flows — is King Hussein.”

“Changing the Nature of Relations with the Palestinians”

“Israel has a chance to forge a new relationship between itself and the Palestinians. First and foremost, Israel’s efforts to secure its streets may require hot pursuit into Palestinian-controlled areas, a justifiable practice with which Americans can sympathize.”

“To emphasize the point that Israel regards the actions of the PLO problematic, but not the Arab people, Israel might want to consider making a special effort to reward friends and advancehuman rights among Arabs.”

“Forging A New U.S.-Israeli Relationship”

“Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality — not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes. Israel’s new strategy — based on a shared philosophy of peace through strength — reflects continuity with “Western values” by stressing that Israel is self-reliant, does not need U.S. troops in any capacity to defend it, including on the Golan Heights, and can manage its own affairs.”

“To reinforce this point, the Prime Minister can use his forthcoming visit to announce that Israel is now mature enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and loan guarantees at least, which prevent economic reform.”

“Conclusions – Transcending the Arab-Israeli Conflict”

“Israel’s new agenda can signal a clean break by abandoning a policy which assumed exhaustion and allowed strategic retreat by reestablishing the principle of preemption, rather than retaliation alone and by ceasing to absorb blows to the nation without response.”

“Israel’s new strategic agenda can shape the regional environment in ways that grant Israel the room to refocus its energies back to where they are most needed: to rejuvenate its national idea, which can only come through replacing Israel’s socialist foundations with a more sound footing; and to overcome its exhaustion, which threatens the survival of the nation.”

“Ultimately, Israel can do more than simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict though war. No amount of weapons or victories will grant Israel the peace its seeks. When Israel is on a sound economic footing, and is free, powerful, and healthy internally, it will no longer simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict; it will transcend it. As a senior Iraqi opposition leader said recently: Israel must rejuvenate and revitalize its moral and intellectual leadership. It is an important — if not the most important element in the history of the Middle East. Israel — proud, wealthy, solid, and strong — would be the basis of a truly new and peaceful Middle East.”

“Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime minister in 1996, to make ‘a clean break’ from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries. Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Washington. In Paul Wolfowitz’s words, ‘The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad.’ It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, and Jewish interests are not the main reason for it now.”

“Recently, Netanyahu suggested that President Bush had assured him Iran will be prevented from going nuclear. I take him at his word. Netanyahu seems to be the main mover in America’s official adoption of the 1996 white paper A Clean Break, authored by him and American fellow neocons, which aimed to aggressively remake the strategic environments of Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. As they say in boxing circles, three down, two to go.”

Journalist Jason Vest wrote that the report was “a kind of US-Israeli neoconservative manifesto.” He also wrote:

“To properly understand the Syria Accountability Act, one has to go back to a 1996 document, ‘A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,’ drafted by a team of advisers to Benjamin Netanyahu in his run for prime minister of Israel. The authors included current Bush advisers Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. ‘Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil,’ they wrote, calling for ‘striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.’ No wonder Perle was delighted by the Israeli strike. ‘It will help the peace process,’ he told the Washington Post, adding later that the United States itself might have to attack Syria. But what Perle means by ‘helping the peace process’ is not resolving the conflict by bringing about a viable, sovereign Palestinian state but rather – as underscored in ‘A Clean Break’ – ‘transcending the Arab-Israeli conflict’ altogether by forcing the Arabs to accept most, if not all, of Israel’s territorial conquests and its nuclear hegemony in the region.”

The document has been in use for the last 18 years and it did secure Israel thereby destroying almost all of the Middle East and North Africa… That’s what the Jews do best, killing people and destroying nations!

Do you want to stop them? Join our party before it’s Iran’s turn…