Tag Archives: CIA

Israel’s Hate On Iran

Ever since the Nuclear Deal went trough, Israel has been on Iran’s back 24 hours a day. They say that we have nuclear weapons, that we’re the greatest terror nation in the world, and so on. What is funny is that the Iranian regime now lets the UN enter Iran, for them to check all of our nuclear reactors and other places to see that the regime doesn’t produce any nuclear weapons. Even the USA and the European Union trust the UN’s judgement, the only “state” that doesn’t do so is Israel. They still say the regime is producing nuclear arms.

We, as national socialists know that this is pure bullshit. The Iranian regime never did produce any nuclear weapons, nor did they even think about it. The same thing happened with Iraq, Libya, Syria and so many more nations… Israel simply wants Iran to become its bitch (I’m sorry for my choice of words). Though, that will never happen! We’ll never stop fighting, we have existed for 10 000 years and we will exist for at least 10 000 more years. Javid Iran!

Also, we need to remember that what the Iranian regime is doing, is extremely stupid. They are letting agents from the UN enter Iran… who knows who these people are? They could be CIA, MI6 or Mossad agents, there to spy on our great nation. This is the first step for a war on Iran! This is what happens when a bunch of people with an IQ of 80, get to run our nation. They don’t think, they just act.

Israel doesn’t want the sanctions to be lifted, they want us to starve and die. That’s why they are “begging” the USA and the EU to put sanctions on us, once again. They use nuclear weapons as an excuse for that. That’s why we can’t trust the EU, USA, UN or any other organization, union, country and more in the world. Why? They are ALL controlled by Jews.

The Jews are the most hated people in Europe, especially in Greece, they are extremely hated in the Middle East and other parts of the world. People are getting more and more pissed off for every day that passes, unemployment is rising, people are losing their savings, their homes, their f***ing lives. Immigration is rising, racial riots are happening more often, people are finally waking up. The most sold book in Greece and Iran is… Mein Kampf. It is time that YOU finally join the National Socialist Party of Iran! We have gotten an increase in members, Iranians are waking up. It is time that YOU also wake up, because we don’t take easy on traitors – we punish them severely!

So, what are you – a traitor or a nationalist?

The Nuclear Deal

Most Iranians have probably noticed all this talk about the “Iranian Nuclear Deal” – as the Jewish media calls it. People in the streets of Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz and many more cities are cheering, thinking that we will get rid of the sanctions and become “friends” with all the other countries. PressTV calls it the deal of the century, saying that the Islamic Republic is going into the future.

It isn’t like that, this deal will kill us all! It will open up for trade and slowly the Islamic Republic will start to cooperate more with the Jews without even noticing, and after a few years the regime will start to support the USA in some of their “freedom operations” (divide and conquer operations). Then there will be demonstrations, no real ones of course, but instead demonstrations controlled by the CIA and Mossad. Those will then turn into a war, just like with Libya and Syria, which will destroy Iran once and for all and leave it just like Iraq – a desert.

In Libya, a similar thing happened in the beginning of the 2000s. Gaddafi signed a deal with “the West” and became “friends” with them, the sanctions were lifted and Libya could trade freely. Just 7-8 years later Libya was invaded and Gaddafi killed. The same thing is happening to Syria too. The exact same thing will happen to us, if this deal goes trough! Sure we will get a better economy and maybe some American weapons and technology – but is it worth it? For Iran to really become strong, power must be taken trough a revolution and the new government must only care about its own people. We don’t need foreign help and extensive trade to survive, we have what we need here in Iran. The rest can be imported, and everybody wants to trade with a strong nation – don’t forget that.

My point is that cheering for this deal is retarded, because at the end it will result in Iran becoming like Syria or Libya. So if you have to cheer, cheer for us! We will get rid of the Islamic Republic – the right way. We will free you from the hijab, and give you freedom and a great economy – not the Jews.

Javid Iran!

Iran—Iraq War

War

Iranian soldiers during Iran—Iraq War

The Iran—Iraq War was one of the stupidest mistakes ever made…

The Iran—Iraq War was an armed conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Iraq lasting from September 1980 to August 1988, making it the 20th century’s longest conventional war. The war began when Iraq invaded Iran via air and land on 22 September 1980. The Iranian Revolution in 1979 would inspire insurgency among Iraq’s backstabbing Shias. Although Iraq hoped to take advantage of Iran’s revolutionary chaos and attacked without formal warning, they made only limited progress into Iran and were quickly repelled. For the next seven years, Iran was on the offensive.

The war was provoked by the US and Israel. The Mossad had been trying to assassinate Saddam Hussein since the early 70s because Saddam was getting increasingly powerful during the years. He strengthened the military of Iraq and by the year 1991, Iraq had the 4th largest military in the world. Thanks to Saddam, Iraq became wealthy, powerful and extremely stable. The sectarian violence ended and Wahhabi movements and Shia movements where effectively taken care of. A stable Iraq was a threat to Israel and its allies (USA, UK, surrounding Arab countries… ).

When, in 1979, Iran was in a revolutionary chaos (there were major clashes between Communist, Nationalist and Islamist forces), the US provoked the war from Iraq’s side so that both sides would destroy each other during the process. The USA promised Iraq better relations, no sanctions, major economic aid and they even helped Iraq build nuclear weapons but they also gave Iraq some chemical weapons (Mustard and nerve agents) but as soon as Iraq lost the war — Saddam was stabbed in the back by his “friends”.

The US didn’t only provide Iraq with weapons but also Iran was provided with weapons — afterwards the sale of arms to Iran was named the Iran—Contra affair. The reason for the sale of arms to Iran — even though it was illegal to do so — was to make Iran and Iraq destroy each other without any bigger involvement from US or Israeli side.

During the Battle of Waterloo, the Rothschild’s (a Jewish family of bankers) funded both sides to first of all destroy as much as possible and also to profit heavily from both sides. Now just take a second and think about that, it didn’t matter who would win, because either way they would profit and gain in power. Strategically it’s genius, but morally, well what would you say…

Also, don’t forget that after about a year, Saddam Hussein tried to end the war. He negotiated peace talks with Khomeini, though he didn’t care since he saw the war as a holy one. The US and Israel also forced Iraq to continue and therefore the war continued.

The war cost both sides in lives and economic damage: half a million Iraqi and Iranian soldiers, with an equivalent number of civilians, are believed to have died, with many more injured; however, the war brought neither reparations nor changes in borders.

Javid Iran!

ISIS

ISIS

Threat or False Flag?

The Islamic State (IS), which previously was known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) or the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and is also known by داعش (Daesh), is an unrecognized state and a Salafist extremist group active in Iraq and Syria in the Middle East. It is being funded and supplied with weapons by the Gulf States, Israel and the United States.

The leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, is a Mossad agent known as Elliot Shimon.

Another Jew Jew Jew Times Three

The group is infamous for its professional use of social media. The way they use social media is unusually good, not even professional US companies can’t handle it the way they do. Which makes you think… is somebody helping them? Yes, the CIA and Mossad are helping them. They get professional help with posting their tweets, sometimes accounts deliberately don’t get closed down by Twitter so they can spread their message and also the Mossad opens accounts by the thousands every day for the group, in case others get closed down.

Call of ISIS

A bit too professional…

YODO

… don’t you think?

Officially they want to take over the world by bringing all Muslim-inhabited regions of the world under its political control, beginning with territory in the Levant region, which includes Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon, Cyprus and Turkey.

Though that is just mere bullshit, how the hell are 50 000 people supposed to take over the world when they only exist to take down Bashar al-Assad. That’s right, ISIS is pure propaganda to take over Syria and perhaps even Iran since we are the last ones standing up to the Jewish-American terrorists.

Remember in 2013, when Israel was begging the USA to intervene in Syria because of Bashar al-Assad allegedly killing his own people… that never happened because of millions of people protesting against another war all over the world. Also there was no proof of the President killing his own people. Shortly thereafter Bashar al-Assad was elected to stay by over 90% of the Syrian people.

See for yourselves:

Bashar wins Bashar won Bashar

The president is here to stay and if you don’t like it well…

Fuck Off Jews

Funny picture

… tough luck!

Right now ISIS has control of about 40% of Syria and is advancing extremely fast, Kurds have also stolen parts of northern Syria and other terrorist groups such as the FSA have taken control of other territories in Syria. Only about 40% is in the hands of the Syrian government. The US airstrikes are only making it worse for the government, killing soldiers, civilians and destroying buildings in the government controlled areas.

Now you know it! ISIS is a false flag operation by Israel and its allies to get rid of President Bashar al-Assad. As soon as he is gone, ISIS stronghold will miraculously disappear. Syria will be turned into a failed state, just like with Muammar Gaddafi and Libya.

Javid Iran!

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

The perhaps most important document ever for us Iranians to read is “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”! The document explains why the Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had to die and why the same thing will happen to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. It also explains why other regimes (Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Morroco, Kuwait… ) in the Middle East stayed even though those regimes murdered a 100 times more people than Iraq and Syria together.

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm is a policy document that was prepared Iraq/Syriain 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel. The report explained a new approach to solving Israel’s security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on “Western values”. It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, and the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting their possession of “weapons of mass destruction”.

As the United States and others prepared to attack Syria for Israel with a made-up excuse, remember this was all planned out well in advance. Additionally, the USA and Britain used chemical weapons on innocent civilians during the Iraq War.

According to the report’s preamble, it was written by the Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000, which was a part of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies.

Former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle was the “Study Group Leader”, but the final report included ideas from Douglas Feith, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.

“While there are those who will counsel continuity, Israel has the opportunity to make a clean break; it can forge a peace process and strategy based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism, the starting point of which must be economic reform.”

The introduction specifically proposes three new policies:

1. Rather than pursuing a “comprehensive peace” with the entire Arab world, Israel should work jointly with Jordan and Turkey to “contain, destabilize, and roll-back” those entities that are threats to all three.

2. Changing the nature of relations with the Palestinians, specifically reserving the right of “hot pursuit” anywhere within Palestinian territory as well as attempting to promote alternatives to Arafat’s leadership.

3. Changing relations with the United States stressing self-reliance and strategic cooperation.

“This can only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which prevents economic reform.”

“A New Approach to Peace”

“While the previous government, and many abroad, may emphasize land for peace— which placed Israel in the position of cultural, economic, political, diplomatic, and military retreat — the new government can promote “Western values and traditions”. Such an approach, which will be well received in the United States, includes peace for peace, peace through strength and self reliance: the balance of power.”

“Securing the Northern Border”

“Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: —striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan. —paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces… “

“Israel also can take this opportunity to remind the world of the nature of the Syrian regime. Syria repeatedly breaks its word. It violated numerous agreements with the Turks, and has betrayed the United States by continuing to occupy Lebanon in violation of the Taef agreement in 1989. Instead, Syria staged a sham election, installed a quisling regime, and forced Lebanon to sign a “Brotherhood Agreement” in 1991, that terminated Lebanese sovereignty. And Syria has begun colonizing Lebanon with hundreds of thousands of Syrians, while killing tens of thousands of its own citizens at a time, as it did in only three days in 1983 in Hama… Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan comprehensive peace and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction programs, and rejecting land for peace deals on the Golan Heights.”

“Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy”

“Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”

“Since Iraq’s future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq, including such measures as: visiting Jordan as the first official state visit, even before a visit to the United States, of the new Netanyahu government; supporting King Hussein by providing him with some tangible security measures to protect his regime against Syrian subversion; encouraging — through influence in the U.S. business community — investment in Jordan to structurally shift Jordan’s economy away from dependence on Iraq; and diverting Syria’s attention by using Lebanese opposition elements to destabilize Syrian control of Lebanon… Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and Syria. Shia retain strong ties to the Hashemites: the Shia venerate foremost the Prophet’s family, the direct descendants of which — and in whose veins the blood of the Prophet flows — is King Hussein.”

“Changing the Nature of Relations with the Palestinians”

“Israel has a chance to forge a new relationship between itself and the Palestinians. First and foremost, Israel’s efforts to secure its streets may require hot pursuit into Palestinian-controlled areas, a justifiable practice with which Americans can sympathize.”

“To emphasize the point that Israel regards the actions of the PLO problematic, but not the Arab people, Israel might want to consider making a special effort to reward friends and advancehuman rights among Arabs.”

“Forging A New U.S.-Israeli Relationship”

“Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality — not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes. Israel’s new strategy — based on a shared philosophy of peace through strength — reflects continuity with “Western values” by stressing that Israel is self-reliant, does not need U.S. troops in any capacity to defend it, including on the Golan Heights, and can manage its own affairs.”

“To reinforce this point, the Prime Minister can use his forthcoming visit to announce that Israel is now mature enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and loan guarantees at least, which prevent economic reform.”

“Conclusions – Transcending the Arab-Israeli Conflict”

“Israel’s new agenda can signal a clean break by abandoning a policy which assumed exhaustion and allowed strategic retreat by reestablishing the principle of preemption, rather than retaliation alone and by ceasing to absorb blows to the nation without response.”

“Israel’s new strategic agenda can shape the regional environment in ways that grant Israel the room to refocus its energies back to where they are most needed: to rejuvenate its national idea, which can only come through replacing Israel’s socialist foundations with a more sound footing; and to overcome its exhaustion, which threatens the survival of the nation.”

“Ultimately, Israel can do more than simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict though war. No amount of weapons or victories will grant Israel the peace its seeks. When Israel is on a sound economic footing, and is free, powerful, and healthy internally, it will no longer simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict; it will transcend it. As a senior Iraqi opposition leader said recently: Israel must rejuvenate and revitalize its moral and intellectual leadership. It is an important — if not the most important element in the history of the Middle East. Israel — proud, wealthy, solid, and strong — would be the basis of a truly new and peaceful Middle East.”

“Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime minister in 1996, to make ‘a clean break’ from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries. Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Washington. In Paul Wolfowitz’s words, ‘The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad.’ It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, and Jewish interests are not the main reason for it now.”

“Recently, Netanyahu suggested that President Bush had assured him Iran will be prevented from going nuclear. I take him at his word. Netanyahu seems to be the main mover in America’s official adoption of the 1996 white paper A Clean Break, authored by him and American fellow neocons, which aimed to aggressively remake the strategic environments of Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. As they say in boxing circles, three down, two to go.”

Journalist Jason Vest wrote that the report was “a kind of US-Israeli neoconservative manifesto.” He also wrote:

“To properly understand the Syria Accountability Act, one has to go back to a 1996 document, ‘A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,’ drafted by a team of advisers to Benjamin Netanyahu in his run for prime minister of Israel. The authors included current Bush advisers Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. ‘Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil,’ they wrote, calling for ‘striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.’ No wonder Perle was delighted by the Israeli strike. ‘It will help the peace process,’ he told the Washington Post, adding later that the United States itself might have to attack Syria. But what Perle means by ‘helping the peace process’ is not resolving the conflict by bringing about a viable, sovereign Palestinian state but rather – as underscored in ‘A Clean Break’ – ‘transcending the Arab-Israeli conflict’ altogether by forcing the Arabs to accept most, if not all, of Israel’s territorial conquests and its nuclear hegemony in the region.”

The document has been in use for the last 18 years and it did secure Israel thereby destroying almost all of the Middle East and North Africa… That’s what the Jews do best, killing people and destroying nations!

Do you want to stop them? Join our party before it’s Iran’s turn…